Monday, January 28, 2013

Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon plans to assign significantly more personnel in coming years to counter increasing threats against U.S. government computer networks and conduct offensive operations against foreign foes, a U.S. defense official said on Sunday.

The plan, which would increase both military and civilian staffing at U.S. Cyber Command, comes as the Pentagon moves toward elevating the new command and putting it on the same level as the major combatant commands.

The official said no formal decisions had been made on the expanding staffing levels or changing Cyber Command into a "unified" command like U.S. Strategic Command, which currently oversees cyber command and the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal.

Any changes to the combatant command structure would be made based on strategic and operational needs, and take into account the need for efficient use of taxpayer dollars, said the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly.

The Pentagon was working closely with U.S. Cyber Command and the major military commands to develop "the optimum force structure for successfully operating in cyberspace," the official said.

The Washington Post, quoting senior defense officials, reported late Sunday that the Pentagon had decided to expand Cyber Command's current staffing level of 900 to 4,900 in coming years.

The official confirmed that Cyber Command planned to expand its force significantly, but said the specific numbers cited by the Post were "pre-decisional."

The newspaper said senior Pentagon officials had agreed to increase the force late last year amid a string of attacks, including one that wiped out more than 30,000 computers at a Saudi Arabian state oil company. it said

The plan calls for creating three types of force under the Cyber Command, said the defense official.

"National mission forces," would protect computer systems that undergird electrical grids and other kinds of infrastructure. "Combat mission forces," would help commanders abroad execute attacks or other offensive operations, while "cyber protection forces," would focus on protecting the Defense Department's own systems.

Details were still being worked out, the official said.

(Reporting by Sarah Lynch and Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by David Brunnstrom)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/pentagon-boost-cybersecurity-force-fivefold-report-034248436.html

British Open leaderboard Jessica Ghawi People Water Fred Willard Emmy nominations 2012 Ramadan 2012 Michelle Jenneke

March of Technology Eliminating Jobs

Part one of two.

Middle-class jobs not only in this country, but in developed countries around the world, have been lost due to the march of technology, and experts predict the majority of these jobs will not return.

Science fiction novels have warned of a future in which robots and computers would replace humans, and, according to an article in NBCNews.com, that day may be here.

As the software that runs computers, machines and devices becomes both more powerful and sophisticated, these computers, machines and devices can now more capably and efficiently complete the tasks that humans have done in the past, and unfortunately, many workers find themselves replaced by these software driven machines.

One expert in the field, Andrew McAfee, who is the principal research scientist for MIT, stated that he ?has never seen a period where computers demonstrated as many skills and abilities as they have over the past seven years.?

Labor economists in this country report that half of the 7.5 million jobs lost during the recession were middle-class wage positions.? Unfortunately, they also state that only two percent of the 3.5 million jobs gained back after the recession ended are in mid-pay industries, with seventy percent of the jobs gained being in low-pay industries.? Experts predict? the loss of mid-pay jobs is not over, and as technology becomes more sophisticated, more jobs will be lost.

There are those occupations that benefit from technological advances.? App designers for smart phones and tablet computers, and, of course, software engineers, all benefit by the increasingly technical and sophisticated computer software advances.? But overall, technology eliminates more jobs than it creates.

To be continued.

Original Article.

Source: http://www.tucsonbankruptcylawfirm.com/march-of-technology-eliminating-jobs/

bully bohemian rhapsody bohemian rhapsody spike lee carson daly heejun han donovan mcnabb

New online dating thread

Well, I'm sitting here drinking wine and chillin' out on a cold night so what the heck?

I won't do the online dating thing. But I live in a metropolitan area and have a lot of options. To me, online dating is just too much work and too much like shopping for a new car or something. I'll bet soon Amazon will have an online dating site. Suprised they don't already!

What I've done is get involved in Meetup.com but not specifically to meet someone..just to go out and have a good time. I figured that if happened to meet someone nice to go out and have a good time with then it would be icing on the cake but my primary objective it just to get out and socialize. I really enjoy the whole getting dressed up and going out scene.

But I DID meet someone with some interesting results and posted a bit about it on the other thread..so here's the conclusion:

But I think it's an example of what NOT to do if you have expressed interest in someone else:

I met this guy right after Christmas at a Meetup.com event. We hit it off quite well and talked until everyone else left. The next night we went to another event at a bar and danced and afterwards he walked me to my car and asked if he could date me. He seemed eager to see me and even asked about the next day.

I said I'd like to date him but had plans the next day but we'd see each other a few days later at New Years and was looking forward to it. I definitely gave him the impression that I was interested. I said "Sure" and we kissed each other goodnight. First time I'd kissed another man or expressed interest in one in 25 years!

A few days later we saw each other at a New Years Party. Had a good time, danced, kissed each other when the ball dropped. He told me he wasn't sure about his schedule with his kids (he has two kids ages, 10 and 12) but would be in touch about us getting together. I said "No problem, you let me know."

Week later I texted him to say "hi". We chatted a bit and he said he wanted to see me. I replied the same thing to him. He told me he'd let me know what his schedule was after he talked to his ex.

A few days later he emails me not to ask me out but to inform me that he will be at the same Meetup event that I signed up for that coming Saturday. I said "Ok, see you there" but am wondering about us actually going out.

The night of this event I get a text from him saying he's sick. I don't answer. It's not like we had an actual date or anything and sometimes the best reaction is no reaction. Ball is in his court now as far as I'm concerned.

Almost 10 days later, on Martin Luther King Day, I got an email from him that morning asking if I want to go to a movie. I was at work and didn't read it until that evening. I replied to his email. He then says he never saw the movie and would I like to go see it this coming Saturday? He said he'd get back to me "By the end of the week about what time".

I said "Sure"..and said that I was looking forward to it. I mentioned that I'd be away all day Friday and he should text or call if he needed an answer right away. No reply from him at all that week.

I came home last night (Friday) at 9:30pm. No email, text or call from him at all. Checked my email this morning at 10 am and nothing from him at all.

Then, TODAY at 11:30 am I get a text from him asking:

"How is your day looking?".

That's it. This is on the DAY of our supposed date, almost at noon.

My reply was:

"Well, originally I thought I had a date with this guy but I never heard from him so I made other plans"

His reply: "Sorry I meant to get to you yesterday"

My reply: "Oh well. BYE"

What a

What's ironic is that I don't much care about dating or meeting someone so I doubt he's going to get someone more laid back than me. Good luck to him out in the dating world cuz he's gonna need it.

__________________
And now it's your chance to move on
Change the way you've lived for so long
And find the strength you've had inside all along
'Cause life starts now


Last edited by Freak On a Leash; Today at 08:49 PM.

Source: http://talkaboutmarriage.com/life-after-divorce/66303-new-online-dating-thread.html

miami dolphins buffalo bills pittsburgh steelers seattle seahawks ryan tannehill cispa space shuttle new york

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Lawmakers require VA to track effects of burn pits

WASHINGTON (AP) ? J.D. Williams didn't think much about the smoke cloud that often shrouded his air base in Iraq. Not when it covered everything he owned with black soot or when his wheezing and coughing made it difficult to sleep at night.

"We just went about our business because there was a war going on," said Williams, a retired chief warrant officer who was responsible for maintaining some 250 aircraft for the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division.

He returned home from that second stint in Iraq in 2006 and subsequently was diagnosed with an irreversible lung disease that his doctor suspects could be related to smoke from one of the hundreds of burn pits that dotted Iraq and Afghanistan during the course of the two wars. The pits were used to burn off the garbage that accumulates at military bases, everything from Styrofoam and metal to paints, solvents, human waste and medical waste.

A new Department of Veterans Affairs registry, mandated by Congress, will be used to try to determine if there is a link between the burn pits and long-term health problems.

Military personnel who were stationed near an open burn pit can sign up. Researchers will use the database to monitor health trends in participants, and the VA will alert them to major problems detected.

Over the long term, the findings could make it easier for veterans who served near burn pits to obtain disability payments.

Williams, 56, of Huntsville, Ala., was initially told that he would have to prove that his illness, diagnosed as constrictive bronchiolitis, was service-related. He walked out of the room. Eventually, after he traveled to Washington and met with members of Congress, the VA increased his disability rating 10 percent.

He said he's hoping the registry will pave the way for other soldiers to avoid a similarly exasperating process. If researchers find certain illnesses are linked to exposure to burn pits, then the VA would be more likely to declare those illnesses a presumptive condition, eliminating the need for a veteran to prove that his or her illness is service-related.

Sixty-three burn pits were still being used in Afghanistan as of Dec. 26; those in Iraq were closed by December 2010. Camps with fewer than 100 people are not required to report the use of a burn pit, so there could be more, but generally much smaller ones. Proponents say the burn pits were so widespread that the large majority of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan could participate in the registry.

In 2009, the military updated its policies on burn pits to prohibit the burning of hazardous materials such as certain medical waste, batteries and tires, and whenever possible, to situate them where the smoke would not blow over work and living quarters.

"When our service members voice concerns about burn pit exposures as well as other health issues, we take our responsibility seriously to investigate these exposures and possible health risks, and to implement any protective measure that are indicated and feasible," said Defense Department spokeswoman Cynthia O. Smith.

The creation of the burn pit registry has been several years in the making.

Air Force Lt. Col Darrin Curtis said in a memo disclosed by the Army Times in 2008 that he believed a particularly large burn pit at Joint Base Balad, one of the largest air bases in Iraq, was an acute health hazard, and he was amazed that it was allowed to operate without restrictions.

Congressional hearings followed that featured sick veterans, contractors and family members who had lost a loved one from illnesses they attributed to burn pits. The Pentagon said that none of the monitoring conducted at Balad identified an increased risk for long-term health problems. It has maintained that position over the years but also acknowledges that some personnel have persistent symptoms, possibly as a result of elevated exposures to the smoke, existing health conditions or other unknown factors.

An Institute of Medicine study requested by the VA and made public in 2011 concluded there was insufficient data to determine whether burn pit emissions had long-term health consequences. The study found the pollutants measured at Balad were generally present at a concentration so low that it would not be expected to cause any harm, even if a person was exposed to that concentration for a lifetime. The two exceptions were particulate matter and acrolein.

Particulate matter is a mixture of small particles and liquid droplets that can lead to acute respiratory problems. But the high concentrations at Joint Base Balad came primarily from local sources such as traffic and dust storms, rather than the burn pit, according to the institute, which advises the government on health issues.

Acrolein is a liquid primarily used as a herbicide and in making other chemicals. Exposure can lead to eye, nose and throat irritation. Although the concentration exceeded precautionary levels set by the Environmental Protection Agency, it was still far below the concentration that led to nasal and lung damage in laboratory animals, the study said.

The Pentagon said it is continuing to study the potential hazards of burn pit exposure.

The VA opposed the legislation setting up the burn pit registry even though it has registries for those exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam and for those who served during the Gulf War. The department did not oppose trying to track potential burn pit-related illnesses, just the mechanism proposed.

"We said it was not the best scientific approach for learning about long-term health outcomes and it really wasn't necessary for outreach because we have other programs in place," said Dr. Paul Ciminera, director of the VA's Post-9/11 Era Environmental Health Program.

As to whether the burn pits lead to health problems in soldiers, Ciminera cited the Institute of Medicine report. "We need to do further research to see what the long-term effects could be," he said.

Democratic Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico, the lead Senate sponsor of the registry legislation, said he pushed ahead despite VA objections because the department seems to instinctively reject concerns that veterans are harmed by their surrounding environment. He cited Agent Orange as an example and said the VA initially resisted a link between the defoliant and the health of soldiers who served in Vietnam.

Many supporters of the registry, including Williams, are also participants in a class-action lawsuit filed against KBR Inc., which contracted with the government to operate several of the burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some 50 lawsuits were consolidated into one case in a Maryland federal court. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for various injuries, emotional distress and fear of future disease. KBR is seeking to dismiss the lawsuits on grounds it deserves the same immunity that prevents the plaintiffs from suing the federal government.

"Every type of waste imaginable was and is burned in these pits," the plaintiffs said in their lawsuit.

Veterans groups were big backers of the registry, and an often-divided Congress overwhelmingly sides with them rather than the VA.

"You've been told since you're a little kid: 'Don't put a Styrofoam cup in a fire and breathe it because it's bad for you," said Ray Kelley, national legislative director for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. "They do that all day long on these stops along with Lord knows what else, from human waste to all sorts of garbage. You're inhaling that on a daily basis. It can't be good for you."

___

Online:

Department of Veterans Affairs: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/index.asp

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/lawmakers-require-va-track-effects-burn-pits-085359722.html

dallas tornado video 1940 census instagram for android dallas news dallas fort worth dfw 1930 census

PaaS Provider ActiveState And The Paradox Of Aligning With HP And Cloud Foundry

StackatofeatureimagePlatform-as-a-Service (PaaS) provider ActiveState has a sweet deal with HP. It is the official PaaS for the entire HP cloud business.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/e4do1k8gszo/

shabazz muhammad angela corey zimmerman charged bonobos charles manson al sharpton actuary

New home construction increases sharply in December

By Alejandro Lazo

?

Construction of new residential buildings saw a sharp increase in December, driven largely by work begun on new apartments.

The Commerce Department reported that builders started on new housing at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 954,000 units, up 12.1% from November and up 36.9% from December 2011.

Although construction became a part of the housing recovery last year, it hasn?t made a significant contribution to the hiring picture, Jed Kolko, chief economist for real estate website Trulia.com, wrote in an e-mailed analysis.

?The construction rebound hasn?t created new construction jobs,? Kolko wrote. ?In 2012 builders bet on local markets with strong job growth and low vacancy rates, not markets experiencing a big price bounce-back.?

Builders began work on 780,000 homes last year ? up 28.1% from 2011, when new home construction hit a record low, and the most since 2008. But the number of starts last year was still sluggish compared with historical standards, economists noted.

via latimes.com

Check out new homes offered at Heritage Lane by Robson Homes

Source: http://www.toptennewhomecommunities.com/blog/new-home-construction-increases-sharply-in-december/

philadelphia eagles obamacare Todd Akin Register To Vote Fox News Live Obama 2016 Who Is Winning The Election 2012

Ford Focus top-selling domestically produced vehicle in China in ...

(January 26, 2013) SHANGHAI, China ? Ford continues Go Further in China as independent industry sales data show the Ford Focus was the country?s best-selling nameplate in 2012. For the full year, sales of the Focus totaled 296,360 vehicles, more than any other domestically manufactured passenger car, according to industry consultancy IHS Automotive.
?
Coming soon after Ford China announced an annual sales record in 2012, the IHS data illustrate Ford?s growth momentum entering 2013 as it launches two new SUVs in the world?s largest auto market. Ford sold 626,616 wholesale vehicles in China in 2012, up 21% from a year earlier.
?
?It?s really exciting for us to see how enthusiastically Chinese consumers have taken to the Focus, making it the best-selling passenger vehicle in 2012,? said John Lawler, chairman and CEO of Ford Motor China. ?And now with the all-new Kuga and all-new EcoSport, we?re preparing to go even further in 2013 as we aggressively expand our SUV lineup.?
?
The all-new Kuga and all-new EcoSport SUVs will be produced at Changan Ford?s advanced manufacturing facility in Chongqing, giving Ford a strong position in the SUV market, the fastest-growing segment in China?s auto industry.
?
The Kuga was officially launched on Jan. 22, with six models featuring 1.6 liter and 2.0 liter variants of the EcoBoost GTDi Engine. Ford has also announced pre-sale pricing for the all-new EcoSport featuring the award-winning 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine or 1.5L Ti-VCT engine. While aimed at different market segments, both vehicles bring class-leading quality, safety, and advanced green and smart technologies to Chinese consumers.
?
?Kuga and EcoSport are the latest examples of our commitment to bring 15 new vehicles to China by 2015, while also doubling our production capacity and our China dealership network,? said Lawler. ?We?ve seen that Chinese consumers love the Focus, and we think they?ll love our all-new SUVs, too.?

Bookmark/Search this post with:

Source: http://www.motorwayamerica.com/news/ford-focus-top-selling-domestically-produced-vehicle-china-2012

ricky williams missouri primary minnesota caucus knowshon moreno knowshon moreno sovereign citizen komen